How Comparative Negligence Can Affect Your Personal Injury Claim

When you’re injured in an accident caused by someone else’s actions, filing a personal injury claim can help you seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages. However, what happens if you share some of the responsibility for the accident? This is where comparative negligence comes into play—a legal principle that can significantly impact the outcome of your claim. Feel free to contact us today if you have any questions.

What Is Comparative Negligence?

Comparative negligence is a legal concept used to determine the degree of fault shared between the parties involved in an accident. Rather than assigning full blame to one party, the court or insurance company evaluates how much responsibility each party bears. Your compensation is then adjusted based on your percentage of fault.

Types of Comparative Negligence

There are three main types of comparative negligence laws, and the rules vary depending on your state:
1. Pure Comparative Negligence
In states following this rule, you can recover damages even if you are 99% at fault. However, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault. For instance, if your damages are $10,000 and you are 30% at fault, you would receive $7,000.
2. Modified Comparative Negligence (50% Rule)
Under this system, you can only recover damages if your fault is less than 50%. If you are 50% or more at fault, you are barred from receiving compensation.
3. Modified Comparative Negligence (51% Rule)
Similar to the 50% rule, but in this case, you can recover damages as long as your fault does not reach 51% or higher. If you are equally or more responsible than the other party, you cannot recover damages.

How Comparative Negligence Works in Practice

Let’s say you were in a car accident, and the total damages amounted to $20,000. During the investigation, it was determined that:
• The other driver was speeding, making them 70% responsible.
• You were distracted by your phone, making you 30% responsible.

In a state with pure or modified comparative negligence, your compensation would be reduced by 30%, leaving you with $14,000 instead of the full $20,000.

Proving Fault in Comparative Negligence Cases

To minimize the impact of comparative negligence on your case, it’s crucial to establish the other party’s liability as clearly as possible. This often involves:
• Collecting evidence: Photos of the accident scene, surveillance footage, and witness statements.
• Documenting injuries: Medical records and expert testimony to show the extent of your damages.
• Working with a skilled attorney: An experienced personal injury lawyer can build a strong case to reduce your percentage of fault and maximize your compensation.

Why Hiring an Attorney Matters

Navigating a personal injury claim involving comparative negligence can be complex, especially when insurance companies try to shift more blame onto you. An experienced personal injury attorney understands the nuances of state laws and can advocate for your rights to ensure you receive fair compensation.

Final Thoughts

Understanding how comparative negligence affects your personal injury claim is essential for securing the compensation you deserve. Every case is unique, and the outcome depends on several factors, including the evidence presented and the state’s specific negligence laws.

If you have been injured and believe someone else was at fault, don’t leave your claim to chance. Contact us today for a free consultation to discuss your case and explore your options.

Categories: Uncategorized